That is more a rant than anything, and a bit removed from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for girls. Sure I'd love to start a clothes firm of my own which might even have it’s own “social mission” so to speak. Clothing companies objectives are making money by focusing on ladies. In the method nearly all of clothes corporations make the world worse for ladies. It is as if it is an agenda against women. Probably most women’s styles are designed and conceptualized by males from the drawing board to the final sewing collectively of the apparel merchandise. The few ladies who're in the women’s clothing design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend towards higher clothing designs for ladies who want practicality, dignity and operate of their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma is available in for numerous women who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who simply want practical, comfortable clothes are really underrepresented . Positive, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since a lot of low-rise or pores and skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-size shorts, and tastelessly-short skirts are the kind of clothes that most likely nearly all of women buy (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means these are the kinds that may continue to be manufactured and moreover these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their means into all sorts of women’s clothes, even those which can be speculated to be for function not style. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and many others. It's not the one clothes company that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates trend into operate. It brings us back to the place we started. As quite a few women who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have stated, they resort to men’s clothes for higher fit, higher consolation, better freedom of motion and higher durability. I might say that generally unisex sizing is the very best solution to go with some features that will help accommodate people who might have a bit more hip or belly (each women and men). The majority of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even in relation to “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is unimaginable. Normally, women can match into men’s clothes this way. The scrubs had been provided by the ability. I just lately was working in a research facility and was required to put on scrubs. I advised her that in terms of scrubs, a size small pant doesn't match me and it is strange because most small-measurement men’s pants match me. The supply particular person mentioned she thought a size small would match me. The supply person stated that it's as a result of women have hips and men don’t. I informed her that plainly numerous small-sized males would find it onerous to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people appear to overlook is that some men do have fairly-prominent hips and nearly all of men’s clothes are meant for males with perfectly straight hips. In truth when males get older, of their 40s they fairly often develop bigger hips. Years in the past, I recall a radio commercial for a special form of Levis denims which have been meant for older men and it was stated that the options had more room within the hip and thigh. But males have a greater deal in terms of clothes. Women’s clothes is always made to include trend reasonably than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Publish, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and various other such shops, or online stores have some of the higher varieties of clothes meant for hiking and different outside actions. Brands corresponding to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and numerous others. These brands are inclined to have the best possible materials, and one of the best features. They've one of the best mixture of fabrics in order to be lightweight as possible for sizzling days and which might protect in cold days with out numerous bulk. They are likely to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to use a big measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the a part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to put on and just had a very awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-minimize jackets for girls by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to boost the female form whereas being “useful” for outside activity, or that's what the designers had in mind and but I have to surprise what they were considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and proscribing after i moved. I don’t know the way it ever received manufactured and possibly hundreds have been made and it seemed to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality management people” missed some main design flaws. I want I wrote down the type quantity so that maybe I might discover a hyperlink to it in the web and possibly you all can see for your self. There are different women’s active put on that may not be as excessive however which nonetheless have sufficient lack of operate so that most energetic women simply cannot use them. The Gap and Previous Navy usually are not notably for active put on but they have small line of such clothing. I think that they're awful in materials and design. The Gap, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Goal, K-Mart and other such shops, primarily solely have clothes manufactured from cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is purported to be a “sports store” but it surely carries exercise clothes for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so on) and although these are well-identified model names, I discover that they really put an excessive amount of vogue into clothes at the expense of perform. They went out of business years in the past however additionally they had clothing for ladies that I found to be impractically designed. In New York City the place I stay there's one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-effectively-identified retailer in lower Manhattan which sells all sorts of outside/camping/hiking tools and clothing. There used to be a store in NYC called Herman’s and another referred to as Robbin’s. Removed from it. I've seen women in these stores speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they've workout leggings and sports bra set appeared in every single place for extra practical designs . There may be an organization that a whole lot of you most likely have heard of known as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active wear. There are various Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Previous Navy’s and It would seem that there are a lot of stores that would have something for each lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while playing sports or participating in rugged out of doors activities. Why do I at all times discover that the clothes that come the closest to being useful and rugged and practical are the ones which are discontinued and changed by people who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are actually ineffective. They are meant for girls who have good figures , even who are professional models and the bathing suits are sexist for my part. They may proceed a certain type for a number of seasons or they might substitute the type and never revive it. Why should any bathing swimsuit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the highest be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain kinds of designs called “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so practically designed you can just grab them, throw them on, and walk out the door to train or do anything. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as marketed to be. Throughout my life I have gone from store to retailer throughout certain instances of the yr in search of one of the best rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer. It is all the time laborious to search out anything near what I want. It usually goes for sneakers and slippers and other footwear too. I often have to take whatever comes closest and that's normally within the men’s section. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over concerning why they have been made the way they were.. I once discovered some snug slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd thing was that the soles have been designed with fairly-deep grooves that had been very intently spaced they usually were throughout the only . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the principle piece of clothes that might be touching the bottom and going by way of all sorts of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing shoes which might be meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to scrub. I can’t for the life of me understand why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and but it doesn't work on any type of foot put on like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothing producer seen this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so on) get caught in the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the fixed and intense rolling of the tires means that lots of the debris will be hurled off. No human can create that kind of physical pressure to repeatedly pressure the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles onerous to clean. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be crammed up with debris and wouldn't help much in serving to the wearer to effectively climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are made from rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that solely acquire dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothing technicians engaged on a greater sort of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking footwear are used, and it could make it pointless to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I've observed some unusual designs that do not contribute to function. It appears to me that grooves are just placed on the soles of shoes for style purposes. This goes for sneakers too. Lots of sneakers which can be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such sorts of pants, there are these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. Of course I'm not an skilled in making footwear or shoe-soles and i could be fallacious , but I am sufficient of an professional in sporting shoes meant for lively lifestyles and I think that lots of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the unsuitable thing. I wonder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the back of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I feel it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in shops corresponding to Okay-Mart and Goal the place there are a big number of women’s underwear. It is hard to find the kind of briefs that most of our grandmothers used to put on, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I desire consolation, durability and simple-care. All that doesn't communicate for me. Something that gets caught you-know-the place is unacceptable. I have been within the underwear part of department shops and other stores (I have to admit I by no means seemed in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t count on to find anything practical there), and I've seen older ladies trying to find one thing that is age-applicable and dignified and , once more, sensible. There's little apart from these hi-cuts. See one of many links under for an article in regards to the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” aren't modest sufficient. It appears it has all the time been about bodily limiting ladies. That’s the best way I take a look at it. Additionally one of many hyperlinks beneath result in an article about how there will probably be a women’s like of clothing which shall be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've found to what I prefer is a certain Jockey brand transient “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher type of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone more simply . I have to order a measurement larger than I usually would so that the waist would not be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the true objective of “athletic bras” the way in which they are designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for energetic lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some female runners who look like top heavy and nonetheless they are very fast however I wonder if they'll develop back problems later in life. I do know that I might not be addressing the needs of girls born with sure sizes, or who have special wants akin to after surgery, however sport bras should be made to have sufficient comfortable tension to prevent bouncing. There's a necessity for bras that do what some jock straps are alleged to do. I would like to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the suitable area that might make bras unnecessary. It can be great for warmer weather and for simplicity, so you don’t need to hassle with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from transferring. Simply slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you may go out to stroll , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a thing? I feel I discussed in one of my previous posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for girls called Sun Pant. I am certain plenty of ladies would need such forms of clothes. I then installed an elastic band to supply extra tension for the reason that waist band would be a bit too massive in any other case, and the pant is practically a dream. I did have to change the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved cutting into the back of the waistband area since the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is rather practical for lots of actions. It is not so lengthy that the hem drags on the flooring. It isn't for very very hot weather but that can rely on your own means to tolerate sizzling weather. It is of a fabric blend that is not like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but typically the way in which the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I find it's a very individual factor. This is how most hiking pants should be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for very hot weather very very like the unique Coolibar Solar Pant. It is meant for use with a belt but I discover that I don’t want one to wear this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that's for males, but which matches properly and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two hyperlinks below). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight if you bend or transfer. Of course not everybody has the identical figure as I accomplish that others might have a special opinion. However usually this is a good sort of pant . When you do prefer it you need to write to the corporate and tell them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so as the openings are slits almost completely parallel with the waist. I feel they're going to discontinue it so you may want to present it a try. The fabric stretches so it is not as bad as if it have been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets you need to maneuver your hands in a extra unnatural means and even elevate the hem of your shirt to put your arms in your front pants pockets. It must be for fashion, nothing else. Pockets should be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is good too. It is a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too shut will know what I mean. But generally zippers can cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you set your palms in. There's a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this objective. There can be one other men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I discussed them earlier than (see considered one of the two links below). Why aren’t any clothes designers engaged on this? They are of an excellent materials for hot days, but for me, I discovered myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area in order to make the belt unnecessary. I trip a bike. I rarely use shorts even after i jog. However again, I need to settle for no matter comes near what I need. I came across a working quick known as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to just go to clothing stores to take a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I simply questioned why common long pants should not manufactured from such a material. It could be excellent for a hiking pant meant for very popular weather. The fabric was very very similar to a very very lightweight softshell. There may be one from the North Face called The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothes. It is very lightweight, not superb for cold weather by itself however you possibly can put layering under it. It is flexible and fits excellently and allows freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Also , why aren’t there any actually really virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an amazing summertime softshell. There needs to be a vest for traveling. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It doesn't exist. Why not make one in every of lightweight and stretchy materials? I know that I've said to a lot on this put up. I'll stop for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have a number of concepts for the better design of clothes and I'll probably publish again with my ideas unless I'm instructed to not. I may have been a bit political too.
